Syllabus opinion stevens concurrence breyer concurrence kennedy dissent scalia dissent thomas dissent alito html version pdf version. Petitioner salim ahmed hamdan, a yemeni national, is in custody at an american. Rumsfeld1 was the most eagerly anticipated decision of the year. The legal academy goes to practice neal kumar katyal. Judicious balancing at the intersection of the executives power to detain and the citizendetainees right to due process hamdi v.
Dellinger might be overstating his case, but perhaps only by a hair. He filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court to challenge his detention. Rumsfeld,1 the united states supreme court held that a citizen detained by the government as an enemy combatant is entitled. United states supreme court decision part 1 source. They also responded to questions from members of the audience. In november 2001, afghani militia forces captured hamdan in afghanistan and turned him over to the american military. The authority of the commission was challenged by hamdan p. In november 2001, president bush issued an order establishing a system of military commissions as part of the war against terrorism. The case questions the legality of guantanamo military commissions set up by the bush administration, whether the united states congress has the authority to pass legislation preventing the supreme court from hearing the case of an accused combatant.
The military commissions act of 2006 and its implications on the separation of powers jill k. When the supreme court issued its opinion in hamdan v. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Our servers in the cloud will handle the pdf creation for you once you have combined your files. After one year, hamdan was deemed eligible for trial by a united states military. This comment uses hamdan to illustrate why the disparagement of theory is partially. October 16, 2008 a talk by jonathan mahler and neal katyal. The time is not yet right to tell all of the backstory of the case, but it is possible to offer some preliminary re.
But by any yardstick, the june 2006 ruling in hamdan v. United states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit citation. The case questions the legality of guantanamo military commissions set up by the bush administration, whether the united states congress has the authority to pass legislation preventing the supreme court from hearing the case of an. Introduction n the years following september 11, 2001, the branches of the united states government continue to engage in an ongoing power struggle over.
So long as the structure of the military commissions is a blend of military order 1, the ucmj. Salim ahmed hamdan defendant is a yemeni national who was captured by the united states government in 2001 and transported to guantanamo bay, a united states detention facility, in 2002. Rumsfeld halts the military tribunals planned for guantanamo detainees. Hamdan filed his petition for habeas corpus, claiming that the military commission lacked authority to try him since there was no congressional act that authorized them. Rumsfeld is a rare supreme court rebuke to the president during armed conflict. The commissions have been challenged as inconsistent with the geneva conventions and unauthorized by congress. Rumsfeld is a 2006 united states supreme court case with numerous significant constitutional implications. George clooney and matt damon have reportedly been working with aaron sorkin to make a film about the hamdan v. Hamdan filed petitions for writs of habeas corpus and mandamus to chal lenge the. Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit no. In december 2003, hamdan was placed in a part of the guantanamo bay facility known as camp echo, where he was held in isolation. After being detained and brought to guantanamo bay, hamdan was charged with conspiracy to be tried by a military commission and was granted habeas corpus to dispute his charge hamdan claimed that his trial by the u. Salim ahmed hamdan, osama bin ladens former chauffeur, was captured by afghan forces and imprisoned by the u.
The time is not yet right to tell all of the backstory of the case, but it is possible to offer some preliminary reflections on how the case was litigated, the decision, and its implications for the oftnoticed divide between legal theory and practice. Petitioner salim ahmed hamdan, a yemeni national, is in custody at an american prison in guantanamo bay, cuba. The case is the first federal appeal of a military commission conviction by a guantanamo bay detainee in the u. Decided jun 29, 2006 issue in controversy b a c k g r o u n d. Rumsfeld 2006, the supreme court ruled that the bush administrations use of military commissions to. Pdf international law has long been subjected to the charge that it isnt really law at least not in the sense that we usually imagine law.
Rumsfeld and the fight over presidential power, jonathan mahler chronicles the challenge to. In november 2001, during hostilities between the united states and the taliban which then governed afghanistan, hamdan was captured by militia forces and turned over to the u. Under the latter provision, then, the rules set forth in the manual for courtsmartial. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
Not only did the hamdan court fail to defer to the executives reasonable interpretations of the relevant statutes, treaties, and customary international law of war relating to military commissions, but it did not even justify its. Hamdans conviction for the uncharged crime of joining a criminal. On november 8, 2004, however, the district court granted hamdan s petition for habeas corpus and stayed the commissions proceedings. Argued march 28, 2006decided june 29, 2006 pursuant to congress joint resolution authorizing the president to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, or. Rumsfeld opinion of the court military commission commenced. However, the film was set to begin originally by 2011. Rumsfeld, striking down the bush administrations military tribunals, former solicitor general walter dellinger iii pronounced it simply the most important decision on presidential power and the rule of law ever.
Rumsfeld on the constitutionality of using military commissions to try alqaida members accused of. Rumsfeld and the fight over presidential power, on the other hand, is very much an outsiders account. The functional case for foreign affairs deference to the executive branch julian ku john yoo handed down on the last day of the 2005 term, the supreme courts decision in hamdan v. Either method must address the concerns articulated in hamdan v. Commander charles swiftasserted that military commissions were unlawful from the procedural and substantive legal point of the uniform. On december 18, 2003, military counsel was appointed for him. In addition, quirin did not involve the en joining of a military commission. Rumsfeld, the supreme court carried forward the international legal debate over the nature and regulation of armed conflicts between state and nonstate actors that go beyond the territory of the state. It concluded that the presidents authority to establish military commissions extends only to. He concedes that a courtmartial constituted in accordance with the uniform code of military justice ucmj, 10 u. Rumsfeld1 is a rare supreme court rebuke to the president during armed conflict.
1083 72 547 282 1174 787 1515 1324 919 42 1058 774 67 1114 773 1162 858 1436 941 146 155 589 360 407 1436 966 64 671 789 1128 657 455 1426 1246 813 745 980 545 919 526